The special counsel is advising the Supreme Court to deny Trump’s request to stop the decision that rejected his claim of immunity in the 2020 election case.
Jack Smith, the special counsel, requested on Wednesday that the Supreme Court approve a lower court ruling that denied former President Donald Trump’s argument of immunity from federal prosecution. This would allow the trial for his involvement in the 2020 presidential election to move forward.
The special counsel presented a 40-page document to the Supreme Court, stating that the urgency for a speedy trial is highest in cases where a former president is accused of plotting to undermine the electoral system in order to retain their position.
Smith argued that it is crucial for the nation to see the charges go to trial.
Earlier this week, a request was made to the Supreme Court to freeze a certain matter.
ruling made by the court of appeals at the federal level
A court in Washington rejected his argument of having wide immunity against prosecution. of the 2020 US Presidential Election
Supposed attempts to challenge the outcome of the 2020 United States Presidential Election.
Regarding the 2020 election for president.
The three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted Trump until Feb. 12 to request urgent assistance from the Supreme Court, a deadline he met. His legal team requested for the trial proceedings to remain suspended, which they have been.halted since December
Trump has been granted the opportunity to request a review of his immunity argument from the entire D.C. Circuit, allowing him more time before potentially appealing to the Supreme Court.
Trump’s trial in Washington was initially scheduled to begin
On the fourth of March, the case is being overseen by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan.delayed its start earlier this month.
According to Smith’s submission, he suggests that if the Supreme Court deems Trump’s claim of immunity significant enough, they should prioritize the case. The special counsel has proposed a timeline that would permit oral arguments to be heard in March and a decision to be made promptly this term. This would ensure that if the court rejects Trump’s immunity claim, a fair and timely trial can commence with minimal delay.
Smith submitted the court documents to the justices almost a week before the deadline. In these papers, he stated that Trump’s claim of complete immunity from criminal charges for his actions as a public official is not justified by the Constitution, principles of separation of powers, historical evidence, or logical reasoning.
The special counsel stated that if this extreme assertion were to be acknowledged, it would disrupt the long-standing beliefs about the responsibility of presidents and have a negative impact on democracy and the legal system. This is especially concerning in a situation where a former president is accused of breaking laws in order to stay in power after losing an election, thus attempting to undermine the constitutional process of transferring power and denying millions of voters their rights.
According to him, the offenses that Trump is accused of are related to his alleged attempts to undermine the peaceful transfer of power after the 2020 election. He believes that these actions threaten the very foundation of our democratic system.
Smith wrote that a president’s supposed plan to commit a crime in order to invalidate an election and prevent the peaceful transition of power to their successor should not be the first instance where an unprecedented type of complete legal protection from federal criminal law is acknowledged.
If the Supreme Court agrees to Trump’s appeal for a temporary suspension of the lower court’s decision as he pursues additional review, it will probably postpone his trial even more. Trump is currently the leading candidate for the Republican nomination for president, and he argues that being forced to face trial during the peak of the 2024 election cycle would violate his First Amendment rights and disrupt his ability to campaign against President Biden.
Trump
Initially stated in October.
He is arguing that his status as a president should excuse him from the four charges he is facing, leading to their dismissal.pleaded not guilty to all counts.
In December, Chutkan denied his attempt to dismiss the charges, prompting Trump to appeal the ruling to the D.C. Circuit. Smith later… for a
The Supreme Court was requested by
The court will make a direct decision on whether the ex-president is protected from legal charges for actions taken during their official term, bypassing the appeals process. The judges will make the final ruling. for an extension
Declined the special counsel’s appeal for a prolongation.
to intervene at that moment.
Last month, a significant ruling was made by a three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit which supported Chutkan’s ruling to deny Trump’s complete immunity.
“In this criminal case, the previous President Trump is now referred to as citizen Trump and is entitled to the same defenses as any other defendant,” stated the panel, comprised of Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Michelle Childs, and Florence Pan, in a unanimous decision. “However, any immunity granted to him as President does not apply to this prosecution.”
The judges cautioned that Trump’s stance would undermine the balance of power by giving the President complete immunity from all three branches of government. This would prevent Congress from creating laws, the Executive from pursuing charges, and the Judiciary from reviewing any actions taken by the President. It is unacceptable for the Presidency to grant lifelong immunity to former occupants, placing them above the law.
More
More
Source: cbsnews.com